What I am learning this week

I have greatly underestimated the complexity of numerical weather prediction (NWP). I took it as a crude guess, and therefore not very difficult to understand. Given grid sizes of tens of kilometers, I did not anticipate the models to give any accurate picture of the weather. However, this is not the case. The amount of detail that goes into the different aspects of these models make them much more accurate than I originally imagined.

One example of this is how different models handle precipitation: some models create precipitation and have it fall instantly. Others allow it to fall over time. This change in mass in certain grids, and how the falling precipitation alters the environment around it (does it evaporate and cool the air?) affects the grid squares around it.

This has also exposed some fundamental flaws in my forecast understanding. I really need to work on fully understanding upper air soundings. I feel like I have “gotten away with” not fully understanding some of the details, and now I am finding that affecting me in NWP.

I’ll let you know how it goes over the next week.

Thank you for reading my post

Advertisements

About highplainschasing

This blog is about my tales in storm chasing. My name is Seth Price and I am an instrumentation instructor at New Mexico Tech. My amateur radio call sign is N3MRA.
This entry was posted in Commentary, Education and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s